I’m still plodding through week 11 on Disturbed and Disturbing Behaviour. It’s taken several readings, plus two or three nights attempting to put some notes together, to turn it into something that makes sense to me. Judging by the activity on the FirstClass forums, I don’t think I’m the only one that’s finding the reading tough going at the moment. It’s somehow not quite as satisfying as the way in which DSE212 was presented. The chapters seem much more dense and many of them (like this one) don’t seem to have a logical structure to their narrative. They name drop academics and their research, without explaining the wider context. An example from book 2, chapter 2:
Many studies have suggested that disturbed/disturbing behaviour … can be related to difficulties in the relationship with their mothers … (Murray and Stein, 1991; Garver, 1997; Wakschlag and Hans, 1999; Halligan et al, 2004).
I’d much rather see one or two studies explained, than having four name-dropped without proper context. This isn’t the worst example on the course of this tendency – just the most recent that’s irritated me.
On balance however, it’s still an enjoyable and mind-stretching (mind-bending?) experience.
Now, if only the results of TMA01 would appear, I might finally figure out if I’m on the right track! It sounds like the OU have been having some difficulties with the eTMA system according to my tutor. If it’s anything like as poor (from the tutor’s side) as, say, the user experience provided to us humble students by the fOCUS II CD, then I understand why there are problems …