DD307 Notes

Open University DD307 – Revision Notes Index (2011)

Book 1 – Social Psychology Matters

Chapter 1 – Social psychology: past and present (20-12-2010)

Chapter 2 – Methods and knowledge in social psychology (29-12-2010, corrected 08-01-2011)

Chapter 3 – Families (22-01-2011)

Chapter 4 – Emotion (06-02-2011)

Chapter 5 – Self (08-03-2011)

Chapter 6 – Prejudice, conflict and conflict reduction (16-07-2011)

Chapter 7 – Embodiment (06-09-2011) and A3 size mind map (28-09-2011, corrected 06-10-2011)

Chapter 8 – Conclusion: social psychology matters

Book 2 – Critical Readings in Social Psychology

Chapter 1 – Introduction (30-12-2010)

Chapter 2 – Close relationships

Chapter 3 – Attitudes (16-04-2011) and A3 size mind map (19-09-2011)

Chapter 4 – The fundamental attribution error (05-09-2011)

Chapter 5 – Intragroup processes: entitativity (Updated 26-09-2011 – thanks Sam!)

Chapter 6 – Intergroup processes: social identity theory (17-09-2011)

Chapter 7 – Bystander intervention (08-09-2011)

Chapter 8 – Individual differences

Chapter 9 – Conclusion

Blog posts

All of my blog posts relating to the 2011 presentation of DD307 can be found here: http://www.tenpencepiece.net/blog/tag/dd307/

61 comments to DD307 Notes

  • tim

    Hi Jane,

    I’m only just catching up with my blog and emails from this week!

    Epistemology is ‘what counts as knowledge’ – i.e. each of the four perspectives have a different view of what social psychological knowledge is and should be. So the cognitive social (experimental) approach argues that valid knowledge is general and universal laws of human behaviour (in the same way that a physicist seeks out universal laws concerning the behaviour of matter). The phenomenological perspective seeks out conscious meaning from lived experience, whereas the social psyhcoanalytical looks for unconscious meanings and motivations. Finally, the discursive approach counts what is socially constructed through language between people as knowledge.

    As each of the four epistemologies are different, then it means that not only what counts as knowledge is different, but is has an impact on what questions can be asked and answered and how. For example, you’d never see a social psychoanalyitcal practitioner justify their conclusions in terms of statistical significance; an experimental social psychologist wouldn’t appeal to explanations of their results in terms of unconscious motivations that have been introjected into the psyche during childhood.

  • Jane

    Tim – that’s brilliant! Thank you. I’ve now got the concept of epistemology – it was too amorphous for me before but now you’ve related it to each of the perspectives – I’ve got it!

    Many thanks
    Jane

  • David

    Hi Tim

    I’d just like to say a big thanks for posting your DD307 notes.
    You’ve saved me and many others countless hours of work!

    Thanks again

    David

  • Sharon Bates

    Thanks Tim, a big thank you for this it will save me and others a lot of work

    Regards

    Sharon

  • Kim

    Stumbled upon these notes while looking up books for my January start DD307….simply brilliant

    Thanks for sharing: D

  • Jane

    Hi Tim

    Sat DD307 today. Couldn’t have done the revision without your notes. And managed to bung in epistemology and ontology more than once!

    Thanks once again.

    Jane

  • tim

    Hi Jane,

    Glad the notes were of help – and all the best for your results!

    Tim.

  • Suzanne Hannan

    Hi Tim
    , just to say I appreciated your notes from my other modules, it was great always to have the security of them when I was under pressure. Starting DD307 this year and was just wondering some of your notes aren’t highlighted, is this because there have been significant changes to those chapters?

  • tim

    Hi Suzanne,

    Thanks, and all the best for DD307. Some of the chapter notes are missing as I didn’t make notes on all of them (e.g. Close Relationships and Individual Differences). If I remember correctly, I didn’t bother as these were TMA chapters in 2011.

    Tim.

  • Stephen Barry

    Hi Tim,

    I am about to start DD307 and ED209 together and would find it impossible if it were not for your notes. Thank you very much. Did I read that you have a charity that we could make a small donation to?
    Stephen

  • tim

    Hi Stephen,

    You’re welcome. There are a couple of charities I support – details here: http://www.tenpencepiece.net/blog/2012/09/12/one-way-of-saying-thank-you/

    Tim.

What's your opinion? Let me know by leaving a comment!