Now that wasn’t too bad in the end – certainly once I’d viewed the DVDs a couple of times. Being schooled through the late sixties, seventies and early eighties I can recognise aspects of all four theories being used during my education. I can also recognise some of the things that have been used with my children as well. It certainly helps to explain why some of the heated debates over the last few years have occurred (for example, the impact of television viewing on children) – and why people take different positions. My notes are here.
I’ve enjoyed this week’s study and feel I’m starting to slowly get into this course. It’s been on the four ‘grand theories’ of child development and the text, combined with the programmes on the course DVD, have been very interesting.
The four theories (and the main researchers cited) are:
Behaviourism (or learning theory) – Skinner
Social Learning Theory – Bandura
Contructivism – Piaget
Social Constructivism – Vygotsky
The DVD was great for getting some of Piaget’s experiments and the limitations of his theory to stick. Seeing his classical conservation experiments demonstrated and then comparing the results from the modified experiments (that give a rationale for what the child is being asked to do) has certainly helped that part of the chapter to stick. Behaviourism had been covered pretty well in DSE212, so much of that material felt familiar and Bandura’s theories will probably stick because of the use of the Bobo doll. I had one of those when I was growing up (same one, by the look of the photographs in the text book) and it brought back some nice memories. My Godfather brought one back for me from a business trip to the US. I was always afraid to punch it to hard in case it burst! It sat for years in my bedroom at my parent’s house until eventually it got thrown out, while I was at University I think.
So, I seem to be back on target with study now and I’ll work on my notes over the weekend. Good job too as I’ve got quite a number of evenings away from home ahead of me, with stays in Bracknell, Madrid and New York between now and the end of February to fit in.
Silly, I know – but I was amused by the Eagle Market headline on the thisisderbyshire site today. I didn’t think there was much point in playing the audio …
While the headline may be amusing, the story it’s attached to certainly isn’t. Combined with the Derby Playhouse being closed and the increasing number of empty shop units, parts of town are now starting to resemble what I remember of Coventry in the early 1980’s.
Not a great week for study – it’s taken me nearly two weeks to do the first week! Still, I am still ahead of the game as the official start date isn’t until 7th February. My target is to get the first TMA drafted before then, so it’s still looking ok. I’ve also managed to create my own notes as well – they’ll get rehashed again come revision time in September.
Right, I’ve managed to start work on ED209 over the last couple of days, so with any luck, I’ll have got my first assignment finished by the time of the official start date of February 7th – giving me a four week headstart. Looking at my work and social calendars for the first quarter of next year I’ll need it!
I’m trying to create my revision notes as I go along this time. On DSE212 I didn’t really make proper notes until I was revising for the exam. It would have been a lot easier if I’d made notes during the course (rather than simply annotating the textbooks) and then used those notes to do most of my revision from.
Book 1 Chapter 1 is on children and development – and seems mostly ‘common sense’ to me. The idea that the definition of childhood is dependent on the culture, point in history, societal and parental values prevalent as the child matures seems to be no great surprise. It’s also no surprise that “childhood is constructed and reconstructed both for and by children” (James and Prout) either. The four major historical perspectives on development – Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke and Kant are all interesting in their own right but none appear to me to be complete. Good news – as it should make TMA1 interesting to do if I choose the option that’s available on this chapter.
Time to get back to note taking I think …
OK. I confess I lost most of my interest in this year’s strictly come dancing when Cherie Lunghi was voted off. Particularly when I realised that Danni Minogue was one of the judges on the X-Factor on ITV. To understand the importance of this, you have to understand the “intellectual conversations” board at work. It’s currently like this:
- Favourite motorway – M69 or M40? (in my opinion this has to be the M69 – a motorway so empty because it runs from nowheresville – Leicester – to no-onewantstogothereville – Coventry)
- Which Minogue – Kylie or Danni? (Danni – obviously)
- Strictly come dancing or X Factor? (Strictly come dancing – but only while Cherie was still in it, then X Factor, because Danni is a judge)
So, I only saw the strictly results show last night. Surely anyone with the tiniest brain could have worked out that under the scoring system, there was no hope of Tom avoiding the dance-off? It took me about 5 seconds! I mean, it isn’t exactly A level maths that’s required (or GCSE maths, for that matter).
What’s more frightening than the supposed BBC (delete as applicable: cock-up/conspiracy/muppets) is the outcry on the forums and in the gutter press – here, for example, or here. TV pundit Charlie Brooker recently said “… thousands of joyless cry babies have learnt to treat the whole of TV as a reality show in which they can vote off the things they don’t like, by complaining to Ofcom, whether they saw the offending broadcast or not”. Come on people – grow up – and recognise Saturday night television for what it is. Entertainment – just entertainment. And spend your time and effort in making a difference to things that do matter this Christmas.
I’ve just had my ‘Exploring Psychology Project’ result back from the OU – and I passed! That means I just need another 180 points to get the diploma. I’m not sure if I’m completely looking forward to next year’s course on Child Development, but if nothing else it will be a challenge. Because I registered for it last year and then had to withdraw before it started, it means I have the first two books already. I’ll be trying to make a start over Christmas because if it’s similar in workload to Exploring Psychology (and it should be) then I’ll need a few weeks in hand to make sure I finish the final assignment in time.
First posts are impossible to write, but, I’m back blogging after a break of a couple of years. Maybe I’ll rant a little less this time around, but then again …