The result for TMA01 appeared just before I set off for my Easter break. After more than a year’s absence from essay writing, I’m pleased that my mark was closer to the one I got for the final essay I wrote on DSE212 than the first essay I wrote for it! Onwards and upwards, hopefully.
Well, who would have thought it? Skegness, at the start of April, with decent weather, (compared to the other times I’ve come to Spring Harvest over the past few years) a Costa Coffee bar in Butlins and wireless internet access too. Fantastic!
The week has been fun, with lots of good teaching – particularly the studies on Acts in the big top, led by Gerard Kelly. Just as enjoyable have been the talkback sessions, with him and Pete Broadbent fielding questions from a few hundred people at once …
It’s been a good place to get away from the hassles of daily life and put some time into the course. I’ve been rewarded with a week I’ve really enjoyed, particularly when I compare it to some of the stuff I had to wade through last week. This chapter makes sense, because, I think, it has a consistent and well-structured narrative that uses the work of the researchers being cited to make its points, rather than simply to appear to name-drop them like the previous chapter did. What’s confusing is that the two chapters share an author in common. Maybe chapter 2 was written on an off day 😉
Anyway, I find myself relating to points made about both conflict and co-operation between siblings being an important part of development, certainly thinking back on my own experiences of growing up and that of my own children.
I found the acknowledgment at the end of the chapter that although psychologists have spent a lot of time studying the face to face interactions of children, the rise of disintermediated contact between children (though mobile ‘phones and the internet, for example) is likely to change not only our understanding of how children interact, but has the potential to influence their development in new ways.
It’s certainly arguable whether such changes brought about technology are ‘good’ or ‘bad’; but what is required is research in this area to understand the nature of these changes. If I ever get as far as my Masters(!), this would be one area that I’d be interested in researching myself.
By the way, thanks to everyone who’s sent me messages saying they’re enjoying the blog and the notes I’ve been producing – this week’s are here. I hope they’re helpful, though the health warning attached to them is that they’re produced for me, they are unlikely to be 100% accurate(*) or complete (as I’m just a student like everyone else) and I’m sure other people’s notes are better than mine. But, if you find them useful, that’s great.
(*) If you do spot something that isn’t right, please leave me a comment!